

Is that different from the pair in my OP post? I can't see any differenceUlrich wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:56 am In the meantime I found one more pair. It is derived from an augmented dodecahedron:
![]()
May I suggest the uniform compounds, and "gridoid1", "gridoid2", and "gridoid3" in my folder (the hulls of rhombic triacontahedron stellations)Ulrich wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:22 am I gave my computer another 16-GB memory and I got some noble 120-vertex-polyhedra but all of them were compounds. And in many other cases Stella crashes as before. I tried all uniform ones and their duals, the compounds of pairs of chiral 60-vertex noble polyhedra but I didn‘t find any distinct new one.
Also, the hulls of the duals in this folder - isohedra with equilateral triangles. In particular "du ditrigonal a", "dudid a", "dugid a", "dugid e", "dumid e", "Rhote a", "Rhote e", and "Unnamed".Ulrich wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:22 am I gave my computer another 16-GB memory and I got some noble 120-vertex-polyhedra but all of them were compounds. And in many other cases Stella crashes as before. I tried all uniform ones and their duals, the compounds of pairs of chiral 60-vertex noble polyhedra but I didn‘t find any distinct new one.
Stella is still a 32-bit program, so it has a limit of 3 GB of memory. So I'm afraid adding won't memory won't make a difference.Ulrich wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:22 am I gave my computer another 16-GB memory ... Stella crashes as before...
No, but it might be a while. I'll try to get it to compile for 64-bit again sometime, but I seem to remember it wasn't straight forward.Ulrich wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:35 am Robert,
does this mean that we will never be able to solve the noble polyhedra problem with the help of Stella4D?